Posted on October 25, 2025 by anthonyhopkins33

Take a look! 📌

Take a look! 📌 https://pin.it/23jzoWsoi

Posted on October 25, 2025 by anthonyhopkins33

Writing a Research Paper has Changed since 1995

Search tools

AI Overview

+24

Writing a research paper in APA format requires following specific guidelines for structure, formatting, and citations, most recently outlined in the 7th edition

. You can break down the process into five main steps, beginning with the research phase and ending with a final revision.

1. Research and planning

Choose a topic and research question. Select a topic that is both manageable and engaging. Formulate a focused research question that your paper will answer.
Develop a thesis statement. Your thesis should be a clear, concise statement that presents the main argument of your paper.
Conduct in-depth research. Gather credible sources, such as scholarly articles and books, to build a comprehensive literature review.
Create a detailed outline. Structure your paper using an outline that follows the standard APA format: Title Page, Abstract, Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion, and References.

2. General formatting and structureUse a consistent format throughout your paper. Margins and spacing: Use 1-inch margins on all sides and double-space the entire paper, including the title page and references.Font: Choose a readable font, such as 12-point Times New Roman or 11-point Calibri.Page numbers: Insert a page number in the top right corner of the header on every page, starting with the title page.Page breaks: Start the title page, abstract, and references on their own separate pages. Do not add page breaks between the main sections of the paper, such as the introduction, method, results, and discussion.Student title page: For student papers, center the paper’s title (in bold), your name, your department and university, the course number and name, your instructor’s name, and the assignment’s due date in the top half of the page. 3. Writing the paper’s sectionsWrite the body of the paper following your outline. Abstract: On a new page, write a concise summary of your paper (typically 150–250 words). Do not indent the first line. Include keywords for discoverability.Introduction: Restate the paper’s title at the top of the next page in bold, centered text. Present background information and your thesis statement.Methods: Describe the research participants, materials, and procedures in detail.Results: Report your findings objectively, without interpretation.Discussion: Interpret your results, discuss their implications, and consider limitations and future research.Headings: Use APA’s five-level heading system to organize your content clearly.Level 1: Centered, Bold, Title Case Heading.Level 2: Flush Left, Bold, Title Case Heading.Level 3: Flush Left, Bold Italic, Title Case Heading.Level 4: Indented, Bold, Title Case Heading, ending with a period.Level 5: Indented, Bold Italic, Title Case Heading, ending with a period. 4. Citing sources in the text and referencesYou must cite all sources you use to avoid plagiarism. In-text citations: Include the author’s last name and year of publication in the text. For direct quotes, add a page or paragraph number.(Parenthetical): The results were significant (Jones, 2020).(Narrative): Jones (2020) found that the results were significant.Reference list: On a new page titled “References” (in bold and centered), list every source cited in your paper.Alphabetical order: Order your sources alphabetically by the author’s last name.Hanging indent: Use a hanging indent for each entry, meaning the first line is flush left and subsequent lines are indented 0.5 inches.Basic format: Entries should follow the standard format: Author, Date, Title, and Source. 5. Final review and editingProofread for errors. Read through your entire paper to catch any spelling, grammar, or punctuation mistakes.Check for APA compliance. Verify that all formatting, headings, and citations adhere to APA 7th edition guidelines.Review your content. Ensure your arguments are logical, well-supported by evidence, and directly address your thesis. Writing in APA Style 7th Edition Example Paper | Antioch UniversityThe Structure of a Paper in APA Style. The APA style guidelines are designed for primary research papers that usually contain. the following sections: (a) intro…Antioch UniversityHow to Write an APA Research Paper – Hamilton CollegeView in PDF format. An APA-style paper includes the following sections: title page, abstract, introduction, method, results, discussion, and references. Your pa…Hamilton CollegeResearch Process: A Step-By-Step Guide: 5d. APA FormattingResearch Process: A Step-By-Step Guide: 5d. APA Formatting * Get Started. * Step 1: Develop a Topic. 1a. Select a Topic. 1b. Develop Research Questions. 1c. Ide…Lehigh UniversitySteps To Write A Great Research PaperLet’s dive deeper into the 7 steps in writing a research paper. * Step 1: Choose a Topic. … * Step 2: Conduct Preliminary Research. … * Step 3: Develop a Th…Cambridge Centre for International ResearchAPA Research Paper Outline [Examples + Template]Introduction: This section highlights crucial background information. Main body: Explain the primary points that support your ideas. Conclusion: – Summarize you…PapersOwlAPA Formatting – APA Style 7th edition – Library GuidesGeneral Guidelines * Make 1 inch margins on the top, bottom, and sides. * The first word in every paragraph should be indented one half inch. * APA recommends u…LibGuidesFormat a Student Paper in APA 7th Edition Using Microsoft WordThe process involves setting 1-inch margins on all sides, ensuring the entire document is double-spaced, and removing extra space after paragraphs. A page numbe…YouTubeYour APA paper should include five major sections – Canada CollegeYour APA paper should include five major sections: the Title Page, Abstract, Main Paper, Paper Format and References And Citations. See the timeline handout for…Cañada CollegeAPA Research Paper Outline: A Formatting Guide for StudentsWhat is the Proper Order for an APA Style Research Paper Outline? An APA research paper outline follows this sequence: Title Page. Abstract. Introduction. Liter…write paperAPA Formatting and Citation (7th Ed.) | Generator, Template, ExamplesSet page margins to 1 inch on all sides. Double-space all text, including headings. Indent the first line of every paragraph 0.5 inches. Use an accessible font …ScribbrHow to Write an APA Methods Section | With Examples – ScribbrIn your APA methods section, you should report detailed information on the participants, materials, and procedures used. Describe all relevant participant or su…ScribbrFormat Your Paper – APA Style (7th ed.)Include the title, your name, the class name, and the college’s name. Title should be 12 words or less and summarize the paper’s main idea. No periods or abbrev…University of Wisconsin-WhitewaterAPA In-Text Citations (7th Ed.) | Multiple Authors & Missing InfoPublished on November 4, 2020 by Raimo Streefkerk. Revised on September 5, 2024. This article reflects the APA 7th edition guidelines. Click here for APA 6th ed…ScribbrIn-text Citations – How to Cite in APA Style (7th Edition)Parenthetical vs. Narrative citations * In-text citations have two formats: parenthetical and narrative: Parenthetical: the author name and publication date …The Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyAPA Citation Guide (7th Edition): Reference List and Sample PapersA Reference list provides a reliable way for readers to locate the works authors cite. Here are a few rules for a Reference list: The Reference list appears aft…guides.library.unr.eduReference List Basics – APA 7th EditionBegin your reference list on a new page. The word References should be centered and bold at the top of the page. Double-space your reference list. For each auth…The University of AlabamaElements of reference list entries – APA StyleReference list entries include the four elements of the author, date, title, and source. This page describes each element in detail: the author element, includi…APA StyleYour APA paper should include five major sections – Canada College* GUIDELINES FOR WRITING YOUR RESEARCH PAPER. Your APA paper should include five major sections: the Title Page, Abstract, Main Paper, Paper Format and Referenc…Cañada CollegePublishing a Research Paper | Stratford Peer Reviewed Journals & booksResearch publishing entails five stages. In this blog, I will explain the five stages of publishing a research paper that anyone can follow to achieve the miles…Stratford JournalsA Guide to Academic Writing in APA FormatNeed to write an academic paper using APA format? APA stand for the American Psychological Association and it is a standard writing style in most scientific pap…University of Northwestern, St. PaulMastering APA Format with AI Essay Writers: A Comprehensive GuideMaintain consistent formatting throughout your paper, adhering to APA guidelines meticulously from start to finish.Yomu AIAPA Tutorial Unit 3: Choreographing Your APA PaperAfter completing the title page, we need to insert a page break and set up the headers for the pages after page 1.University of Maryland Global CampusHow to write a research paper5. Outline and write the body.AdobeHow To Write A Research Paper FastWrite the body The outline you created earlier will now be used to write your body paragraphs. Ensure that you are writing focused on your thesis statements and…The Public Health MillennialResearch Paper Format | APA, MLA, & Chicago Templates – ScribbrFrequently asked questions about research paper formatting. How do I format a paper in APA Style? To format a paper in APA Style, follow these guidelines: Use a…ScribbrHow to Write a Research Paper: A Step-By-Step GuideLast but not least, you want to go through your research paper to correct all the mistakes by proofreading. We recommend going over it twice: once for structura…GrammarlyResearch Paper FormatProofreading a Research Paper Spelling mistakes or problems with grammar. Make sure the format is constant throughout the paper. That there is consistent format…http://www.excellent-proofreading-and-writing.com Plagiarism in College Papers and the Use of Proper CitationFailing to recheck what you’ve written is a common problem. Ideally, you should re-read your paper at least once, looking for errors in spelling, punctuation an…apuedge.com

Dive deeper in AI Mode

AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more

Purdue OWLhttps://owl.purdue.eduGeneral Format – Purdue OWL

Your essay should include four major sections: the Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References. Title Page. Note: APA 7 provides slightly different …APA Sample Paper APA Stylistics: Basics General Writing FAQs Additional Resources Can be found here

Economic Inequality

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

INTRODUCTION TO SOCIOLOGY: UNDERSTANDING AND CHANGING THE SOCIAL WORLD

Economic Inequality and Poverty in the United States

Learning Objectives

Understand trends in U.S. inequality.
Explain the social distribution of U.S. poverty.
Distinguish the structural and individual explanations of poverty.
List the major effects of poverty.

In his classic book The Other America, Michael Harrington (1962) brought the reality of poverty home to many Americans. In chapter after chapter, he discussed the troubled lives of the poor in rural Appalachia, in our urban centers, and in other areas of the country, and he indicted the country for not helping the poor. His book helped kindle interest in the White House and Congress in aiding the poor and deeply affected its thousands of readers. Almost five decades later, we know much more about poverty than we used to. Despite initial gains in fighting poverty in the 1960s (Schwartz, 1984), poverty is still with us and has worsened since the early 2000s, especially since the onset of the serious economic recession that began in 2008. What do we know about the extent of poverty, the reasons for it, and its consequences?

Economic Inequality

The United States has a very large degree of economic inequality. A common way to examine inequality is to rank the nation’s families by income from lowest to highest and then to divide this distribution into fifths. Thus, we have the poorest fifth of the nation’s families (or the 20% of families with the lowest family incomes), a second fifth with somewhat higher incomes, and so on until we reach the richest fifth of families, or the 20% with the highest incomes. We then can see what percentage each fifth has of the nation’s entire income. Figure 8.6 “Share of National Income Going to Income Fifths, 2016” shows such a calculation for the United States. The poorest fifth enjoys only 3.8% of the nation’s income, while the richest fifth enjoys 53.2%. Another way of saying this is that the richest 20% of the population have as much income as the remaining 80% of the population.

Figure 8.6 Share of National Income Going to Income Fifths, 2016 Source: Data from Congressional Budget Office.

This degree of inequality is the largest in the industrialized world. Figure 8.7 “Income Inequality Around the World” compares the inequality among several industrialized nations by dividing the median income of households in the 90th percentile (meaning they have more income than 90% of all households) by the median income of households in the 10th percentile (meaning they have more income than only 10% of all households); the higher the resulting ratio, the greater a nation’s inequality. The ratio for the United States, 4.86, far exceeds that for any other nation.

Figure 8.7 Income Inequality Around the World Ratio of median income of richest 10% in each nation to that of poorest 10%. Source: Data from Mishel, L., Bernstein, J., & Shierholz, H. (2009). The state of working America 2008/2009. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press [An imprint of Cornell University Press].

Economic inequality in the United States has increased during the last two decades. The loss of manufacturing jobs and changes in taxation and income distribution policies since the early 1980s have favored the rich and hurt the economic standing of the middle class and the poor (Barlett & Steele, 2002; Wilson, 2009). After adjusting for inflation, the post-tax income of the nation’s wealthiest families grew by a much greater amount than that for the poorest families from 1979 to 2005. It grew by only 6% for the poorest fifth but by 80% for the wealthiest fifth, and it also grew by a whopping 228% for families in the top 1% of the nation’s families (Mishel, Bernstein, & Shierholz, 2009). As the saying goes, the rich get richer. To recall our earlier discussion, to be upwardly mobile, it helps to be well-off to begin with.

Poverty

When U.S. officials became concerned about poverty during the 1960s, they quickly realized they needed to find out how much poverty we had. To do so, a measure of official poverty, or a poverty line, was needed. This line was first calculated in 1963 by Mollie Orshansky who proposed determining the poverty line by multiplying the cost of a very minimal diet by three, as a 1955 government study had determined that the typical American family spent one-third of its income on food. Thus a family whose income is lower than three times the cost of a very minimal diet is considered officially poor.

The measure of official poverty began in 1963 and stipulates that a family whose income is lower than three times the cost of a minimal diet is considered officially poor. This measure has not changed since 1963 even though family expenses have risen greatly in many areas. Bill Herndon – Katrina Leftovers 1 – CC BY-NC-ND 2.0.

This way of calculating the poverty line has not changed since 1963, even though many other things, such as energy, child care, and health care, now occupy a greater percentage of the typical family’s budget than was true in 1963. As a national measure, the poverty line also fails to take into account regional differences in the cost of living. For all of these reasons, many experts think the official measurement of poverty is highly suspect. As a recent report observed, “Most poverty analysts strongly believe that the official poverty statistics are inadequate to the task of determining who is poor in America” (Mishel, Bernstein, & Shierholz, 2009, p. 298).

The poverty line is adjusted annually for inflation and takes into account the number of people in a family: the larger the family size, the higher the poverty line. In 2018, the poverty line for a nonfarming family of four (two adults, two children) was $25,100. A four-person family earning even one more dollar than $25,100 in 2018 was not officially poor, even though its “extra” income hardly lifted it out of dire economic straits. Policy experts have calculated a no-frills budget that enables a family to meet its basic needs in food, clothing, shelter, and so forth; this budget is about twice the poverty line. Families with incomes between the poverty line and twice the poverty line are barely making ends meet, but they are not considered officially poor. When we talk here about the poverty level, keep in mind that we are talking only about official poverty and that there are many families and individuals living in near-poverty who have trouble meeting their basic needs, especially when they face unusually high medical or motor vehicle expenses or the like. For this reason, some analyses use “twice-poverty” data (i.e., family incomes below twice the poverty line) to provide a more accurate understanding of how many Americans face serious financial difficulties.

The Extent and Social Distribution of Poverty

With this caveat in mind, how many Americans are poor, and who are they? The U.S. Census Bureau gives us some answers. In 2009, 14.3% of the U.S. population, or almost 44 million Americans, lived in (official) poverty (DeNavas-Walt, Proctor, & Smith, 2010). This percentage represented a decline from the early 1990s but was higher than the rate in the late 1960s (see Figure 8.8 “U.S. Poverty, 1959–2017”). If we were winning the war on poverty in the 1960s, since then poverty has fought us to a standstill.

Figure 8.8 U.S. Poverty, 1959–2017 Source: Data from U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). Historical poverty tables: People. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/historical/people.html.

Another way of understanding the extent of poverty is to consider episodic poverty, defined by the Census Bureau as being poor for at least 2 consecutive months in some time period. From 2004 to 2007, the last years for which data are available, almost one-third of the U.S. public, equal to about 95 million people, were poor for at least 2 consecutive months, although only 2.2% were poor for all 3 years (DeNavas-Walt, Proctor, & Smith, 2010). As these figures indicate, people go into and out of poverty, but even those who go out of it do not usually move very far from it.

Learning From Other Societies

Poverty and Poverty Policy in Other Western Democracies

To compare international poverty rates, scholars commonly use a measure of the percentage of households in a nation that receive less than half of the nation’s median household income after taxes and cash transfers from the government. In 2000, the latest date for which data are available, 17% of U.S. households lived in poverty as defined by this measure (Mishel, Bernstein, & Shierholz, 2009). By comparison, selected other Western democracies had the following rates (Mishel, Bernstein, & Shierholz, 2009, p. 384):Canada11.4%Denmark9.2%France8.0%Germany8.3%Norway6.4%Spain14.3%Sweden6.5%United Kingdom12.4%

The average poverty rate of Western democracies excluding the United States is 9.8%. The U.S. rate is thus 1.73 times greater than this average.

Why is there so much more poverty in the United States than in its Western counterparts? Several differences between the United States and the other nations stand out. First, other Western nations have higher minimum wages and stronger unions than the United States has, and these lead to incomes that help push people above poverty. Second, the other nations spend a much greater proportion of their gross domestic product on social expenditures (income support and social services such as child care subsidies and housing allowances) than does the United States. As a recent analysis concluded,

Other peer countries are much more likely than the United States to step in where markets have failed to live their most disadvantaged citizens out of poverty. This suggests that the relatively low expenditures on social welfare are at least partially implicated in the high poverty rates in the United States. (Mishel, Bernstein, & Shierholz, 2009, p. 387) In short, the United States has so much more poverty than other democracies in part because it spends so much less than they do on helping the poor. The United States certainly has the wealth to follow their example, but it has chosen not to do so, and a high poverty rate is the unfortunate result.

Who are the poor? Contrary to popular images, the most typical poor person in the United States is white: approximately 44% of poor people are white (non-Latino), 29% are Latino, 23% are black, and 4% are Asian (see Figure 8.9 “Racial and Ethnic Composition of the Poor, 2009 (Percentage of Poor Persons in Each Group)”). At the same time, race and ethnicity affect the chances of being poor: while only 9.4% of non-Latino whites are poor, 25.8% of African Americans, 12.5% of Asians, and 25.3% of Latinos (who may be of any race) are poor (see Figure 8.10 “Race, Ethnicity, and Poverty, 2009 (Percentage of Each Group That Is Poor)”). Thus African Americans and Latinos are almost three times as likely as non-Latino whites to be poor. (Because there are so many non-Latino whites in the United States, the plurality of poor people are non-Latino white, even if the percentage of whites who are poor is relatively low.) Chapter 10 “Race and Ethnicity” further discusses the link between poverty and race and ethnicity.

Figure 8.9 Racial and Ethnic Composition of the Poor, 2009 (Percentage of Poor Persons in Each Group) Source: Data from DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B. D., & Smith, J. C. (2010). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2009 (Current Population Report P60-238). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Figure 8.10 Race, Ethnicity, and Poverty, 2009 (Percentage of Each Group That Is Poor) Source: Data from U.S Census Bureau Current Population Survey. (2008). POV01: Age and sex of all people, family members and unrelated individuals iterated by income-to-poverty ratio and race. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/macro/032008/pov/new01_100.htm.

Turning to age, almost 21% of children under age 18 are poor (amounting to more than 15 million children), including 35.7% of African American children and 33.1% of Latino children (DeNavas-Walt, Proctor, & Smith, 2010). The poverty rate for U.S. children is the highest in the Western world and 1.5 to 9 times greater than the corresponding rates in Canada and Western Europe (Mishel, Bernstein, & Shierholz, 2009). At the other end of the age distribution, 8.9% of people aged 65 or older are poor (amounting to about 3.4 million seniors). Turning around these U.S. figures, about 36% of all poor people in the United States are children, and about 8% of the poor are 65 or older. Thus some 44% of Americans living in poverty are children or the elderly.

The poverty rate for U.S. children is the highest in the Western world. Wikimedia Commons – CC BY-SA 3.0.

The type of family structure also makes a difference: whereas only 8.5% of children living with married parents live in poverty, 43% of those living with only their mother live in poverty (2007 data). This latter figure is about 32% for Asian children and for non-Latino white children and rises to slightly more than 50% for African American children and Latino children (Moore, Redd, Burkhauser, Mbawa, & Collins, 2009). As these latter numbers indicate, families headed by a single woman are much more likely to be poor. Poverty thus has a female face.

Explaining Poverty

Explanations of poverty focus on problems either within the poor themselves or in the society in which they live (Iceland, 2006). The first type of explanation follows logically from the functional theory of stratification and may be considered an “individual” explanation. The second type of explanation follows from conflict theory and is a structural explanation that focuses on problems in American society that produce poverty. As the “Sociology Making a Difference” box discusses, the explanation of poverty people favor affects how sympathetic they are to the poor.

According to the individual explanation, the poor have personal problems and deficiencies that are responsible for their poverty. In the past, the poor were thought to be biologically inferior, a view that has not entirely faded, but today the much more common belief is that they lack the ambition and motivation to work hard and to achieve. According to the World Values Survey, 60% of Americans believe that people are poor “because they are lazy and lack will power.” This percentage reflects the tendency of Americans to favor individual explanations of poverty (Davidson, 2009).

A more sophisticated version of this type of explanation is called the culture of poverty theory (Banfield, 1974; O. Lewis, 1966). According to this theory, the poor generally have beliefs and values that differ from those of the nonpoor and that doom them to continued poverty. For example, they are said to be impulsive and to live for the present rather than the future. Critics say this view exaggerates the degree to which the poor and nonpoor do in fact hold different values and ignores discrimination and other problems in American society (Iceland, 2006).

According to the second, structural explanation, U.S. poverty stems from problems in American society that lead to lack of equal opportunity. These problems include (a) racial, ethnic, gender, and age discrimination; (b) lack of good schooling and adequate health care; and (c) structural changes in the American economic system, such as the departure of manufacturing companies from American cities in the 1980s and 1990s (Iceland, 2003). These problems help create a vicious cycle of poverty in which children of the poor are often fated to end up in poverty or near-poverty themselves as adults.

Sociology Making a Difference

Attributions for Poverty and Public Education Campaigns

The text discusses two general explanations for poverty. The first attributes poverty to lack of willpower and other problems among the poor themselves, while the second attributes poverty to structural obstacles and lack of opportunity in the larger society. As the text notes, Americans tend to favor the first explanation more than the second explanation. They also tend to disagree that the government should do more to help the poor. Could these two sets of views be linked? If so, what would such a link imply for poverty policy?

Sociological research finds that the explanation we favor for poverty—the attribution for poverty we hold—affects whether we want the government to take an active role in helping the poor (Bradley & Cole, 2002). People who attribute poverty to problems in the larger society are much more likely than those who attribute it to deficiencies among the poor to believe that the government should take such a role. The attribution for poverty we hold presumably affects the amount of sympathy we have for the poor, and our sympathy, or lack of sympathy, in turn affects our views about the government’s role in helping the poor. As sociologist Theresa C. Davidson (2009) observes, “Beliefs about the causes of poverty shape attitudes toward the poor.”

This body of research strongly suggests that public support for government aid for the poor is weak because so much of the public attributes poverty to failings among the poor themselves. If so, the public might very well begin to endorse greater government aid if its attribution for poverty became more structural instead of individual. Public education campaigns that call attention to the lack of opportunity and other structural problems that account for poverty thus might further poverty policy by beginning to change public perceptions of the poor.

Most sociologists favor the structural explanation. As our earlier Monopoly example illustrates, poverty greatly blocks opportunities for success. Later chapters document racial and ethnic discrimination, lack of adequate schooling and health care, and other problems that make it difficult to rise out of poverty. On the other hand, some ethnographic research supports the individual explanation by showing that the poor do have certain values and follow certain practices that augment their plight (Small, Harding, & Lamont, 2010). For example, the poor have higher rates of cigarette smoking (34% of people with annual incomes between $6,000 and $11,999 smoke, compared to only 13% of those with incomes $90,000 or greater (Goszkowski, 2008), which helps lead them to have more serious health problems. Adopting an integrated perspective, some researchers say these values and practices are in many ways the result of poverty itself (Small, Harding, & Lamont, 2010). These scholars concede a culture of poverty does exist, but they also say it exists because it helps the poor cope daily with the structural effects of being poor. If these effects lead to a culture of poverty, they add, then poverty becomes self-perpetuating. If poverty is both cultural and structural in origin, these scholars say, a comprehensive national effort must be launched to improve the lives of the people in the “other America.”

The Effects of Poverty

However poverty is explained, it has important and enduring effects, which later chapters will continue to discuss. For now, we can list some of the major consequences of poverty (and near-poverty) in the United States. As we do so, recall the sociological perspective’s emphasis on how our social backgrounds influence our attitudes, behaviors, and life chances. This influence on life chances is quite evident when we look at some of the effects of poverty (Moore, Redd, Burkhauser, Mbawa, & Collins, 2009; Iceland, 2006; D. Lindsey, 2009):

Poor children are more likely to have inadequate nutrition and to experience health, behavioral, and cognitive problems. Kelly Short – Poverty: “Damaged Child,” Oklahoma City, OK, USA, 1936. (Colorized). – CC BY-SA 2.0.

The poor are at greater risk for family problems, including divorce and domestic violence. The stress of being poor is thought to be a major reason for these problems.
The poor are also at greater risk for health problems, including infant mortality, earlier mortality during adulthood, mental illness, and inadequate medical care. Many poor people lack health insurance. Poor children are more likely to have inadequate nutrition and to suffer health, behavioral, and cognitive problems. These problems in turn impair their ability to do well in school and land stable employment as adults, helping to ensure that poverty will persist across generations.
Poor children typically go to rundown schools with inadequate facilities where they receive inadequate schooling. They are much less likely than nonpoor children to graduate from high school or to go to college. Their lack of education in turn restricts them and their own children to poverty, once again helping to ensure a vicious cycle of continuing poverty across generations.
The poor are, not surprisingly, more likely to be homeless than the nonpoor but also more likely to live in dilapidated housing and unable to buy their own homes. Many poor families spend more than half their income on rent. The lack of adequate housing for the poor remains a major national problem.

Key Takeaways

Inequality refers to the gap between the rich and the poor. The United States has a high degree of inequality.
Although the official poverty line measure has been criticized for several reasons, in 2017 about 12.3% of the U.S. population, or more than 40 million people, were living in official poverty.
About 18% of U.S. children live in official poverty; this rate is the highest in the Western world.
Explanations of poverty focus on problems either within the poor themselves or in the society in which they live. These two types of explanations reflect the functionalist and conflict views, respectively.
Poverty has several important and enduring consequences, including many kinds of health problems.

Self Check

about:blank

Reducing U.S. Poverty: What Sociology Suggests

It is easy to understand why the families in Wichita, Kansas, discussed in the news story that began this chapter might be poor in the middle of a deep economic recession. Yet a sociological understanding of poverty emphasizes its structural basis in bad times and good times alike. Poverty is rooted in social and economic problems of the larger society rather than in the lack of willpower, laziness, or other moral failings of poor individuals themselves. Individuals born into poverty suffer from a lack of opportunity from their first months up through adulthood, and poverty becomes a self-perpetuating, vicious cycle. To the extent a culture of poverty might exist, it is best seen as a logical and perhaps even inevitable outcome of, and adaptation to, the problem of being poor and not the primary force driving poverty itself.

This sort of understanding suggests that efforts to reduce poverty must address first and foremost the structural basis for poverty while not ignoring certain beliefs and practices of the poor that also make a difference. An extensive literature on poverty policy outlines many types of policies and strategies that follow this dual approach (Moore, Redd, Burkhauser, Mbawa, & Collins, 2009; Iceland, 2006; D. Lindsey, 2009; Cancian & Danziger, 2009; Turner & Rawlings, 2005). If these were fully adopted, funded, and implemented, they would offer great promise for reducing poverty. As two poverty experts recently wrote, “We are optimistic that poverty can be reduced significantly in the long term if the public and policymakers can muster the political will to pursue a range of promising antipoverty policies” (Cancian & Danziger, 2009, p. 32). Although a full discussion of these policies is beyond the scope of this chapter, the following measures are commonly cited as holding strong potential for reducing poverty:

Adopt a national “full employment” policy for the poor, involving federally funded job training and public works programs.
Increase federal aid for the working poor, including earned income credits and child care subsidies for those with children.
Establish well-funded early childhood intervention programs, including home visitations by trained professionals, for poor families.
Improve the schools that poor children attend and the schooling they receive and expand early childhood education programs for poor children.
Provide better nutrition and health services for poor families with young children.
Strengthen efforts to reduce teenage pregnancies.

References

Banfield, E. C. (1974). The unheavenly city revisited. Boston, MA: Little, Brown; Lewis, O. (1966). The culture of poverty. Scientific American, 113, 19–25.

Barlett, D. L., & Steele, J. B. (2002). The great American tax dodge: How spiraling fraud and avoidance are killing fairness, destroying the income tax, and costing you. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Bradley, C., & Cole, D. J. (2002). Causal attributions and the significance of self-efficacy in predicting solutions to poverty. Sociological Focus, 35, 381–396.

Cancian, M., & Danziger, S. (2009). Changing poverty and changing antipoverty policies. Ann Arbor: National Poverty Center, University of Michigan.

Davidson, T. C. (2009). Attributions for poverty among college students: The impact of service-learning and religiosity. College Student Journal, 43, 136–144.

DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B. D., & Smith, J. C. (2010). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2009 (Current Population Report P60-238). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Goszkowski, R. (2008). Among Americans, smoking decreases as income increases. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/105550/among-americans-smoking-decreases-income-increases.aspx.

Harrington, M. (1962). The other America: Poverty in the United States. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Iceland, J. (2003). Dynamics of economic well-being, 1996–1999 (Current Population Report P70–91). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Iceland, J. (2006). Poverty in America: A handbook. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lindsey, D. (2009). Child poverty and inequality: Securing a better future for America’s children. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Mishel, L., Bernstein, J., & Shierholz, H. (2009). The state of working America 2008/2009. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press [An imprint of Cornell University Press].

Moore, K. A., Redd, Z., Burkhauser, M., Mbawa, K., & Collins, A. (2009). Children in poverty: Trends, consequences, and policy options. Washington, DC: Child Trends. Retrieved from http://www.childtrends.org/Files//Child_Trends-2009_04_07_RB_ChildreninPoverty.pdf.

Schwartz, J. E. (1984, June 18). The war we won: How the great society defeated poverty. The New Republic, 18–19.

Small, M. L., Harding, D. J., & Lamont, M. (2010, May). Reconsidering culture and poverty. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 629, 6–27.

Turner, M. A., & Rawlings, L. A. (2005). Overcoming concentrated poverty and isolation: Ten lessons for policy and practice. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

Wilson, W. J. (2009). The economic plight of inner-city black males. In E. Anderson (Ed.), Against the wall: Poor, young, black, and male (pp. 55–70). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Previous: Social Class in the United States

Next: The Nature and Extent of Global Stratification BACK TO TOP

LICENSE

Introduction to Sociology: Understanding and Changing the Social World Copyright © 2016 by University of Minnesota is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

SHARE THIS BOOK

Pressbooks on YouTube Pressbooks on LinkedIn

Posted on October 25, 2025 by anthonyhopkins33

Race Not For The Swift

https://anthonyhopkinsweb.com/2021/10/26/the-race-is-not-for-the-swift-4/

Posted on October 25, 2025 by anthonyhopkins33

fulltext.pdf

https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1218&x0026;context=cehsdiss

Posted on October 25, 2025 by anthonyhopkins33

0205470084.pdf

https://www.pearsonhighered.com/assets/samplechapter/0/2/0/5/0205470084.pdf

Posted on October 25, 2025 by anthonyhopkins33

the-discourse-of-culture-and-race-in-a-family-therapy-supervision-a-conversational-analysis-20011.pdf

https://bacigalupe.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/the-discourse-of-culture-and-race-in-a-family-therapy-supervision-a-conversational-analysis-20011.pdf

Posted on October 25, 2025 by anthonyhopkins33

2000ryanm.pdf

https://www2.uwstout.edu/content/lib/thesis/2000/2000ryanm.pdf

Posted on October 25, 2025 by anthonyhopkins33

The Experiences of African American Marriage and Family Therapist.pdf

https://aura.antioch.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1546&context=etds

Posted on October 25, 2025 by anthonyhopkins33

James 5:19-20

The Meaning of James 5:19-20, and how it applies to others.

First, I want to say that I have been losing friends as of late simply because of what I have been writing lately. I sure did not realize that what is inside of the Bible really offends others. There are certain subjects that I am trying to discuss with the general public, and suddenly I end of getting the worse end of things.

Second, I would like to expound on the meaning of James 5:19-20. I want to inform all of you that if anyone of my fellow colleagues and family members err from the truth, I am supposed to help them in a spirit of gentleness. However, I have to say that we all sin. There are times when I get hurt in one way or another. I want to be frank that I am supposed to help everyone that is in need. I try not to get tripped up in any way by others. It is that I am trying to make an impact for Jesus Christ.

Galatians 6:1 and James 5:19-20 goes hand in hand to me personally because it all about helping my fellow brothers and sisters in Christ Jesus. I know that I am not perfect, but I am imitating Jesus Christ with my behavior.

Third, I want to say that it is about restoring lives and improving our communities. I want to apologize for my actions if I have offended anyone with the information that I am sharing with people. I am very sorry if I have hurt you with sharing the truth. The message that I am conveying is coming right out of the Bible.

I am only saying that everything is right out of the Bible. I am realizing that our communities are inundated with many forms of immorality that it is a shame. I am making a difference because I am doing my very best to stop using vulgarity and getting upset over things that are trivial to me. If I am losing friends, then, these individuals did not know me or love me in any way. I am not going to stop loving others. Whatever the Lord put inside of my heart through the use of the Holy Spirit, I have to share it with the public.

I would like to say that I am not better than the next person because I have faults and weaknesses just like everyone else. At least, I can admit when I am wrong. I can apologize for my mistakes because there are many mistakes that I have made in my life. When it comes to these Bible verses, I can say that I am trying to clean up my side of the street. I would like for everyone to meditate on these Bible verses because it is obtained right out of the Good Book.

Fourth, I would like to read the Bible verses because this is the truth. I am supposed to love everyone until I pass away. I know that even though James 5:19-20 specifically states that I am look out for anyone who errs from the truth and help them in the name of Jesus Christ. I am striving for spiritual progress rather than spiritual perfection. If any of you are in need, please do not be afraid to speak to me. If I can help you that is fine. Therefore, I do not have anything to hide from anyone on earth. If I cannot hide from God, why should I hide from anyone else? I am calling a spade a spade and it is coming right out of the Bible. I love you very much. Even if a person does not love me back, I am doing my job for Christ Jesus. Thank You Very Much!!

Site Title

Category: Uncategorized

Take a look! 📌

Writing a Research Paper has Changed since 1995

Economic Inequality

INTRODUCTION TO SOCIOLOGY: UNDERSTANDING AND CHANGING THE SOCIAL WORLD

Economic Inequality and Poverty in the United States

Learning Objectives

Economic Inequality

Poverty

The Extent and Social Distribution of Poverty

Learning From Other Societies

Explaining Poverty

Sociology Making a Difference

The Effects of Poverty

Key Takeaways

Self Check

Reducing U.S. Poverty: What Sociology Suggests

References

LICENSE

SHARE THIS BOOK

Race Not For The Swift

fulltext.pdf

0205470084.pdf

the-discourse-of-culture-and-race-in-a-family-therapy-supervision-a-conversational-analysis-20011.pdf

2000ryanm.pdf

The Experiences of African American Marriage and Family Therapist.pdf

James 5:19-20